Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001 at 01:25:29 GMT +0800 (which was 9:25 AM
where I live) witnesses say Thomas Fernandez typed:
JA>> This message probably does not have a Text version. TB will display a
JA>> plain text version, but TB creates this version.
> Weren't we told that, if we hit Reply on such a message, the text
> version that TB creates is used?
If I remember correctly, yes.
> In such a case, if you try to delete the HTML attachment, wouldn't it
> make sense to store the text version that TB creates? I, for one,
> would like that. ;-)
In some cases it might not cause problems, but the text version that
TB creates is not always a good (enough) representation of the HTML
version. This is in the same vein as editing an incoming message. The
current TB implementation does not allow easy editing of incoming
messages, why should this case be different?
Remember, you do have the option of exporting the message, use some
utility to remove the HTML, and import back the edited message.
Obviously this isn't exactly what you wanted, but it's more true to
form for now.
--
Thanks for writing,
Januk Aggarwal
Using The Bat! 1.48f
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
