-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 9:37:08 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
DH> Same key ID, works good. It is his DH/DSS key. I also own his RSA
DH> key. His DH/DSS si created on 19/04/98, does not expire and uses
DH> CAST. Complete ID (64b): 0x3839497A8313390B.
So you are saying that you checked his message and the signature verified
as "Good"? If so, then I don't understand why it shows "Bad" on my
machine, and can think no reason what, why or where the message itself
would have been tampered with.
Are you *sure* you get a "Good" signature on his first message in this
thread? Anyone else getting a good signature? I'm using PGP 7.0.3 but that
shouldn't make any difference at all. As you can see, your signature
checks out just fine:
DH> *** PGP Signature Status: good
DH> *** Signer: Dierk Haasis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Invalid)
DH> *** Signed: 12/02/01 8:37:20 AM
DH> *** Verified: 12/02/01 9:34:34 AM
DH> *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
but even in other threads, Krister's signature shows "Bad" here. There
*has* to be something about his message that is causing that. If it were
my machine, then all messages would be affected coming from TBUDL, if you
know what I mean.
Nick
N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.49c | PGP 7.0.3 | Win 98 SE ]
Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
_____________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.3
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iQA/AwUBOogfIMUChHR7o/3OEQKKzQCdFe/F5rVmlSAwMlCN5E1s+l5IRRwAoJRL
pPAsiNCXzHsIhwjSKhdVH2PD
=pgzT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
