-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 10:19:28 AM, Gerd Ewald Wrote:
GE> Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use
GE> TB-plugin and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP;
GE> ID: 0x8313390B Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7 AB9B 7CC1 18BC 3839 497A
GE> 8313 390B
Well isn't that strange. Yes, I confirm that the Key Fingerprint you sent
is the same as the one on my Key Ring. Well, I will have to report that to
NAI, because that is unacceptable... unless there is some explanation as
to the differences between the two methods of verification. Still, I
cannot understand how verification could affect the message content... It
may have something to do with the way the message digest is re-computed.
Nick
N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.49c | PGP 7.0.3 | Win 98 SE ]
Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
_____________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.3
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iQA/AwUBOog+LcUChHR7o/3OEQLudwCeKhBATrTVsS14RAwu3dqvGuGLVz8An1YX
Co7VMw/A+B4/s+RXammN0130
=bXON
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
