-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 11:49:04 AM, Nick Andriash Wrote:
NA> Well isn't that strange. Yes, I confirm that the Key Fingerprint you
NA> sent is the same as the one on my Key Ring. Well, I will have to
NA> report that to NAI, because that is unacceptable... unless there is
NA> some explanation as to the differences between the two methods of
NA> verification. Still, I cannot understand how verification could affect
NA> the message content... It may have something to do with the way the
NA> message digest is re-computed.
OTOH, if it was something specific to each method of verification, then it
would leave it's mark on all messages. Such is not the case however, and
it's only Krister's messages that I see the "Bad" signature. So, in light
of that, I feel it could very well be something about his messages in
either special characters, encoding, tabs, etc. that goes through some
kind of decoding along the way.
Nick
N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.49c | PGP 7.0.3 | Win 98 SE ]
Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
_____________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.3
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iQA/AwUBOohI1sUChHR7o/3OEQLbTgCg1mfaDV6DbNo/Y3oDARzuNGBd5Y4AoNlb
ahxPKhjCxEpXernVcYsc3pj5
=4KX4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
