Tuesday, May 01, 2001, 6:24:10 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote:

>> You'd say, "Look at NT", well I refuse to, it's a huge gorilla, and
>> sucks to much system resources (in comparison to Linux which needs
>> about the same resources that Win 95/98 series needs).

> Another point against Win2K is their driver scheme. Since it came out
> i wanted to migrate but couldn't because some of my hardware would not
> work or work at a much lower level than designed. There are still
> problems with drivers for my Matrox card and my Guillemot audio card.

On the other hand Xfree86 (the GUI server for Linux) v 4.0.3
take Matrox cards to the limit, they display beautiful images.
:)

And yes the driver scheme of w2k sux. as w2k sux.

-- 
        If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
                     ...Oh wait, he already does.

-- 
______________________________________________________
Archives   : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to