-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Monday, July 30, 2001 at 2:36:46 AM you wrote:
>> TB! won't support PGP 7.x and up (and has good reasons not to do so).
> What do you mean TB! won't support PGP 7.x and up? Sure they will... as
> soon as NAI release the SDK.
Correct. But, can anybody tell me why it seems so important to support
7.x? Is it just because one always wants to have the latest release of
a software, or is there something *really* interesting in 7.x, that
you can't find in for instance 6.58ckt?
A lot of people still work with pure DOS PGP (2.6.3), and for good
reason. And it works.
Just a thought, nothing more ...
>> And I'd prefer a broad base (like GnuPGP) in comparison to the
>> proprietary implementation that Ritlabs offers for TheBat!.
> Not sure what you mean by a "broad base (like GnuPG)". Nothing "broad"
> about GnuPG. By "proprietary", are you referring to PGP... the de facto
> standard for encryption? ;o)
I think with proprietary he means the rather basic approach of TB!'s
built-in support, not the plug-ins for "official" releases.
- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.54 Beta/4 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C
"Do you speak Esperanto?" - "Like a native!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!
iQA/AwUBO2ePo/To1oA8g8dLEQIEXQCgmU/30kqZ79vg9HsIwi+nnsL9lw4AoP7q
sNDdZf0lId9bg1CHz2IuB6na
=YW+d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
