Hello Allie C Martin,

On  Fri, 7 Sep 2001 at 11:01:05 GMT -0500 (which was 9/7/2001 11:01 PM
where you think I live) you told to the list :

> I see your concern but the overhead that Mercury/32 incurs is really
> surprisingly small for a mailserver that also offers so many other
> features. With your system having 128MB of RAM, the addition of
> Hamster or Mercury/32 shouldn't be that bad. :-)

I am running at home on P166/64 MB RAM :-)
My I introduce one of Mercury expert on this list ... Andrew Hogson!

BTW. This listserver run on P133/80 MB :-)

--
Best regards,

- Syafril -


-- 
________________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Reply via email to