Hi Alex, On Thursday, November 22, 2001, 12:24:11, Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote: > Yes, You are right, of course, but it's little sorry, that (for > example) conservations about 2.0 one years (!) ago gone down and 2.0 itself too
AFAIK 2.0 is work in progress. You can't just port a program like TB onto C++ like that - it's a lot of work which the developers have to do. Besides bug-fixing and everything else on the current versions, that is. Maybe they won't release 2.0 as just another version number but instead follow the unix-procfeedings: don't release a new major version until bugs have been fixed and it includes everything that was meant to be included. Some companies release a new GUI with basically the same code behind it and give it a new version number. They will even go as far as making people pay for that. I'm happy that TB is not one of these programs. Roman -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
