S>> I have yet to get infected, thanks to stance the_Bat takes. The virus S>> scan program is very important, maybe not for the_Bat, but for Outlook S>> Express and Outlook, both of which are on this computer even though they S>> are only uses sparingly.
> Sure, Sam, sparingly might be enough! ;-) Can't argue here. When I say sparingly, I do indeed mean SPARINGLY. I have some in-laws who are gung-ho on HTML; don't think they EVER send a plain text message. I use it when I want to send a picture imbedded in the message, something I don't think can be done in the_Bat. It can be sent as an attachment, but, like I said, many people will not open attachments, me included unless I know what is being sent and by whom. S>> I use OE for HTML mail, but might try using Word and attaching it to S>> the_Bat. Only bad part is that most of my correspondents will not open S>> attachments either. LOL > For what in the world do you need HTML in emails? Ok, sending mom an x-mas > card. Right. I'd use OE for that too. ;o) I don't even send Christmas or other holiday cards by HTML. I use Hallmark or Blue Mountain e-cards. I use it to send pictures. I do feel HTML is a bane to the internet and should be stopped but that surely will never happen. Too many tyros on the net who go ga-ga over that stuff. I notice The_Bat is working on incorporating HTML in the next version; sure hope they don't mess up the good thing they presently have. > Peter -- Have a great day, Sam mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men." -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
