Hello Haico, On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:35:50 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, April 3, 2002, 2:35:50 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Haico wrote: > Hi to all, > First of all: Hope that I don't offend anyone for dragging a almost > drowned horse out of the water. But since the discussion I read about > creating a spamfilter I thought about this again. (and someone :) > called this thing a zombie anyway, so.. ;) > I was just thinking.. Why doesn't Ritlabs skip the whole idea of that > Inbox-known folder.. If they got any sense on this matter, they would > see how stupid it is. > 1) degrading your inbox to a spam-folder. > 2) the thing's name is too long and it just don't sound right. > 3) you've got 2 folders with 2 blue arrows.. which looks very stupid. I agree... Current thing looks silly to me and likely will stay unused by me. I for sure am not going to change my filters... > Why not make the opposite, and create something like a junk-folder. > (this has been mentioned before)You can also make a basic-filter with > more options for dealing with spam.. > And give that folder a *RED* arrow and call it unknown. > If Ritlabs would want to have an easy filter for beginners. Than > you've got something that makes sense. And if spam filters could be easily entered, sure I use it. Now have a box called spam... > And a folder with a red arrow would look very nice. :-) -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.60c mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
