-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Melissa Reese [MR] wrote: ... MR> Okay Allie - please explain to me how to set up my TB! 1.60c MR> "correctly" to show Lynna's signatures as "valid".
Once some of us are getting valid signatures on Lynna's messages, I think everyone would agree that the signatures are indeed valid. An invalid report indicates something being wrong. It could be that there's something wrong with the S/MIME setup or that there's something wrong with the message itself, in that it has been altered somehow. The only requirements that I see for validating her signatures is that you have a working certificate database in the address book (those two red address book groups containing the root and intermediate root ca's.) You seem to need to have a valid key for yourself. Do your S/MIME signed messages come up as valid? I didn't do anything fancy for the internal implementation to work except importing new valid keys for myself that I obtained from Thawte. To get the MS CryptAPI implementation to correctly work, I imported my S/MIME certificates into the system repository via the Internet Options. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60h | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE80GYlV8nrYCsHF+IRAp5pAJ9P7NQ95vs6dHwaUS1ijMwpnZ3N1QCeJLj2 7Zus8K9SD5yfR23gyXlueX8= =p2L4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
