-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Disabato [MD] wrote: ... MD> This may be semantics, but I'm getting concerned that we are MD> heading to a road where the CryptoAPI becomes the "correct" way.
I'm not saying it's the correct way. I don't think anyone has said this. We've already stated that it's a work-around until Ritlabs fixes things so the user whichever of the two methods s/he likes. The discussions have been about how to use S/MIME using the MS CryptAPI since the internal implementation seems to be broken in the current TB! release. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60h | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE80FxWV8nrYCsHF+IRAmE9AKCr6uryOxRwraLreBsQcja3cCQeEgCgifTJ 1NYyImn+fAAtYl5eu8pNlz0= =RHKI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
