-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hello Eddie,

Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:06:46 AM, you digitally penned the
following:


EC> This is what just came to my mind when reading the posting from
Micael
EC> Disabato. His S/MIME I can see as valid and he use it under
internal
EC> Implementation.

EC> So, is there a TB! version that can handle it both way?

Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am
using the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version "160.h" So
as far as I can see, I have no problems viewing emails from
persons using either setting. AND the majority of
certificates I have seen are showing as VALID.
- --
Regards,
 Lynna                           
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat!1.60h
Windows XP
PGP ( Public ) Key available at www.apostolic-friends.net/pgpkey.htm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQEVAwUBPM/O9n7nBw6G0JgJAQE7twf/aXKBxZgjMzdQRYPA1vAllEzARcGfc1hQ
nt7W4vH4zb8ISyi/xaT4Yfd3b/Zwyo5DWL8AGWJfJHYVeq8bFeUdpcHk706N6pAn
oLtHYKVV0EehEOVSsHH2A//jHc76y3jX0gOxXZt9xpkHBY9rp6XkCp2rzAmz7K2c
hi2k64j9eX/pUS61SsNTK8MjrePIKlfoA4lB7Daol8fQ0IEKhavAG16UnCKl9rht
Vs4/LvozhFKWbaT4pXajUZv53yvhCOg2kF4d5EvMTyW/voUlRyGpeQUNVsCrvfb+
9YwIHf1XCwYBeXSXVYagSwIoG2V8NOombUTsMNcowD4Oz0Mqt3TY9A==
=AP5H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to