-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote: ... MDP> I think they may be waiting for feedback on the quality.
Yes, I'd think this is the case. Version 1.60i was introduced to the beta list members and they were asked to test it as a candidate for replacing the problematic 1.60h version. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60j | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE81edxV8nrYCsHF+IRAuAuAKDc5rC+SeOWjKqHGtiBHCXTDw4aPgCdHjAj SAvTvsCRbcN8tZA0ufqlC3A= =lsCt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
