-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Clive Taylor [CT] wrote:
CT> Well, we'll have to disagree over this plug-in's usefulness, No problem there at all. Just felt the need to make that distinction, i.e., no useful functionality, a subjective opinion as opposed to no functionality, an objective claim. CT> Allie, but I just hope for your sake that part of its CT> "functionality" isn't to screw up your message base. Yeah. This is an interesting point that hasn't borne out to be a problem yet. AFAIK, the incoming mail scanner scans each message as the POP3 scanner does. It doesn't do anything directly with the message base directly. I see another option to scan messages within a folder ... now that one poses some concern since you are interfering with established message bases. I've been using the plug-in for some time now and have since turned off the system scanner. I manually check other downloads. I'm not a great fan of POP scanners (the system scanner provides adequate protection IMO) and I'm only using the plugin to assist with testing. If they do manage to get it working more smoothly, I may just make using it permanent. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE9BjmMV8nrYCsHF+IRAut9AKDmy0HUYDDnF0vMZIG7tA7vL3dxDQCgokhS U2zkmqyeRBmp2w4NC4D+Zhw= =A77y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
