-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph N. [JN] wrote:
JN> Hmmmm..... Although I could do the same, and trust my firewall to JN> keep out nasty attackers, it seems a big risk. But why? If you can automatically check what comes in through the various routes viruses get in, why should you be worried? The other way is to just scan almost everything that's opened on the system. JN> Do you feel you're conserving enough resources and reclaiming JN> enough speed to justify it? With NOD32 it really seems to be a small amount but it's not only speed and resources that are at issue here. I also get to take one process out of the equation. The less things you have running, the less likely you'll have an adverse interaction between software. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAj0zZm0ACgkQV8nrYCsHF+Lv7QCdFCC7NdNPJ0TAxLzHnbks/QTY 9EQAn3xJQ5AO9e0R5+ABuWiSjC/UNfaT =T3Qr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
