Hi Carren,
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, at 09:15:27 [GMT +1200] (22:15 where I live) you wrote:
CS> I can't believe this! This kind of filtering on email client is
CS> ridiculous. Geez .... even those of us who think OE is the pits, don't
CS> stoop to these levels!
CS> I have never received *any* spam from anyone using TB! and I can't
CS> imagine that anyone using it would use it for spamming purposes.
CS> I guess there is nothing much that can be done about it, but it is
CS> obviously more widespread than originally indicated.
CS> It's a worry :-(
Well I haven't had a single message bounced or refused yet while using the Bat
and I've got a few thousand under my belt.
The fact that the rest of us haven't noticed before is proof enough of the
limit of this. All we need to do is publicise when we find an ISP that does
this so we can inform them of the stupidity of filtering email by client.
--
21 July 2002, 22:23
[ Adam Rykala : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ www.new-wales.net ]
[ Private key : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
And in the news: Check out the next message.
All messages both into and out of this account have been scanned with
AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. However, all attachments should be
scanned also with a virus checker at the receiver's end to ensure that the
files are clean and free of virus infection. All messages are for the
attention of the recipient only.
________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/