Hi Carren, 
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, at 09:15:27 [GMT +1200] (22:15 where I live) you wrote:

CS> I  can't  believe  this!  This  kind  of  filtering  on  email  client  is
CS> ridiculous.  Geez  ....  even  those of us who think OE is the pits, don't
CS> stoop to these levels!

CS> I have never received *any* spam from anyone using TB! and I can't
CS> imagine that anyone using it would use it for spamming purposes.

CS> I guess there is nothing much that can be done about it, but it is
CS> obviously more widespread than originally indicated.

CS> It's a worry :-(

Well I haven't had a single message bounced or refused yet while using the Bat
and I've got a few thousand under my belt.

The  fact  that  the  rest of us haven't noticed before is proof enough of the
limit  of  this.  All we need to do is publicise when we find an ISP that does
this so we can inform them of the stupidity of filtering email by client.



-- 
21 July 2002, 22:23
                                   [ Adam Rykala : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
                                   [                       www.new-wales.net ]
                                   [ Private key : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]

And in the news: Check out the next message.

All  messages  both  into  and  out  of  this  account  have been scanned with
AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. However, all attachments should be
scanned  also  with  a  virus checker at the receiver's end to ensure that the
files  are  clean  and  free  of  virus  infection.  All  messages are for the
attention of the recipient only.


________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/

Reply via email to