On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 10:27, Thomas F. wrote:
> 
> JA> The problem doing that is with Outlook you have to go change a whole
> JA> bundle of settings so the reply is tagged with > 
> 
> Ups, so I am wrong and it has to do with the default setting of OL.
> (Can't MS get *anything* right?)

Some of the default settings are a real pain, and not being able to
customise certain options does make using it awful.  Hence my quest for
a good email client, and my being pointed at TB... not turned back
since.

> JA> Even in the environment I work in where I reply to a lot of technical
> JA> support questions I use top quoting as often several questions are
> JA> asked,
> 
> As I said, in some business enviroenments it makes sense, in others
> not.

Oh I agree too.  There are some cases where I do use bottom quoting
purely because it is just not necessary to quote parts of the mail up
the top for it to make sense.

> >> (The exception I make is the web interface.
> 
> JA> I have to agree.
> 
> I was without a computer for the first two months back in Thailand,
> and had to use web interfaces in internet cafes exclusively. In the
> beginning, my postings included an apoligy for top-replying, then
> people knew. Boy, am I glad to have my computer back. :-)))

Yes, I remember ;)  My ISP is exactly the same.  Their web interface is
rather nice, very quick, but the problem stands in it's default
properties, and formating of replies... oddly enough, it is co-designed
by Microsoft and HP ;)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP Keys : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=SendKeys


________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/

Reply via email to