-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Syafril Hermansyah [SH] wrote:

SH> If you're using other MTA, you will say "sort by receiving date"
SH> is the "right" way, in that way you will never depending on time
SH> clock accuracy of sender PC :-)

I've tried both methods and for prolonged durations. They both fail at
times but the received time is far more reliable for me so I use
received time, though I hide that column in the message list. I guess
each persons experience may very well differ.

- --
Cheers,                   |           List Moderator
 Allie C Martin           |  TB! v1.62/Beta1 | Windows XP Pro
____________..____________:________________..________________
       PGP/GPG Key: http://pubkey.ac-martin.com
'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE9VTeYV8nrYCsHF+IRAmfZAJ900AMwzZ4s3vMIYwOdNcEQ0PgEWgCfVFuC
2sc5IWdQ4duexOjM4mmM2Ww=
=qobb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________________
 Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to