Sh'mae FJ, On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, at 12:12:07 [GMT +0200] (11:12 where I live) you wrote:
FdB> Hello Adam, FdB> Saturday, August 10, 2002, 11:51:10 AM, you wrote: AR>> Without appearing to seem rude.... AR>> AR>> Read what Marck was saying, it's not what YOU or I want, its what the AR>> recipient wants - and in this case its the list. FdB> I read what Marck said. He said that top-quoting is hideous and that FdB> an author should be led by the convenience of the recipient. I FdB> responded in my capacity of a recipient, so it is about what I want. So, in essence, all of Internet etiquette goes out of the window? The recipient in this case is TBUDL, not you or I. FdB> In a later email you refer to FdB> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bambenek-posting-guidelines-02.txt FdB> I find that point 6 of this reference is actually argueing my case. As I said, top posting may only work in QUESTION-ANSWER cases, but in threads it's nothing short of an abomination. A -- 10 August 2002, 11:16 [ Adam Rykala : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ [new-wales] project : www.new-wales.net ] [ Public key : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] When they broke open molecules, they found they were only stuffed with atoms. But when they broke open atoms, they found them stuffed with explosions. All my emails are scanned with AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
