-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
>>> Your RAM seems awfully small. And I am surprised Win95 can handle >>> a 3.2 GB drive. Don't you have problems wih other apps? >> Win95 had a slightly lower memory requirement than other OSes by >> MS. IIRC, Win95 could run inside (just) on 16meg of ram. > Speaking of RAM, I have 128 MB of it and an avrage load of, say, > 60%. If Mary has a total of 32 MB, I can imagine that problems > occur, depending on which programs run in the background. I cannot > check how many MB TB uses, plus AV software, plus etc etc. Opening > an HTML message might just have been the bit too many. This I guess could be true, but the error message is a little unusual for that in my opinion. > But if you read my quoted sentence above carefully, you'll see that > I was talking about the HD, not RAM. I was surprised that Win95 is > able to *address* 3.2 GB of storage. I was referring to the "Your RAM seems awfully small" part ;) But yes... Win95 could handle up to 3.2GB... it's just many BIOS' around at the time had problems handling anything higher than 2.1GB I think it was. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPbYdzCuD6BT4/R9zEQLONQCdEbzw9LLl4V+mRcGqpHFRnruuTdIAn2tZ Wc5vl0x03z4eYapBfaDUc+H3 =0R6m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
