In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote:'

TF> Everybody can buy the "Personal" version, and this doesn't say
TF> anything. Even students are entitled to buy it. If you want to
TF> pay less, you will have to live with this (minor) privacy
TF> compromise.

Minor to you. Not minor to others.

Advising that they pay more is, uhm, frivolous. Especially when
there's no justifiable reason for this breach of privacy. Whether or
not you qualitatively agree with Sean's concern is besides the
point. The fact is that his concerns wouldn't have existed if the
X-Mailer header didn't include the license type.

TF> Some lawyers use AbacusBat.

You don't have to be one to use a copy.

TF> If there were a version integrated into a medical program and it
TF> would make sense for you to use that version, I don't think you
TF> would consider MedicalBat a breach of privacy.

Yes, I would. However, there's a good reason for giving it a medical
related name since it's really an application suited for those who
do medicine. I'd therefore consider it a reasonable and justifiable
breach of privacy. Give me a good reason for specifying in the
X-Mailer header, the nature of the license involved in getting
identical copies of TB!. How does this help the recipients of your
messages? No matter how minor *you* may consider this breach of
privacy, there's no good reason for it so it shouldn't be. What good
reason is there to include this information in the header?

TF> No, but you do have a choice here. It is either the price tag,
TF> special functionality, or the distributor.

There's no special functionality gained by purchasing one license
type over another. What is the justification for adding the license
type to the X-Mailer header.

I can see why SecureBat! should be specified as opposed to The Bat!
and AbacusBat. No problems there. Why the (Personal), (Educational)
and (Business)? I guess Ritlabs has something to gain by doing it as
they did with the serial numbers. I guess you didn't consider the
serial number inclusion a breach of privacy as well?

-- 
Allie C Martin     \      TB! v1.62/Beta7 & WinXP Pro (SP1)
 List Moderator    /   PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to