Simon- Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 6:53:24 PM, you wrote:
S> There's no need to be so sarcastic :-/ If you have an opinion about it, S> fine, but I didn't design Mailwasher, I use it, and as far as I know no one Ah, but you did tout the "feature" and recommend its incorporation into TB, which renders me properly aghast. S> has ever complained about the way it bounces messages, until now. I suspect S> that Mailwasher's apparent popularity and success would have been quickly S> arrested if the methods it employs to bounce mail were rejected/frowned upon S> by ISPs...I'd have expected some noise on the Net by now if that were the S> case! Well, I, for one, wasn't aware that Mailwasher could get away with pulling off this dastardly deed. I wonder what postmaster@say,for_example,earthlink.net would have to say about it? Are you suggesting that there is a way to prevent Mailwasher from doing this? ...besides, if I couldn't be sarcastic here I'd have to find another list to hang out in... -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
