-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Peter,

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:07:00 +0100 your time, you said:

PP> ...  this  "faking  bounces" ain't "fighting spam" even in the slightest
PP> way.  It  has  nothing  in  common  with  any  successful "spam fighting
PP> technology",  the  effect of bounces and faked bounces on amount of spam
PP> is near to zero, not measurable.

Yes  and  no.  I have bounced spam and it hasn't graced my mailbox again. On
the  other  hand,  some spam persists even after bouncing, so it doesn't get
bounced  again,  just  deleted.  I  don't  know  where you are deriving your
statistics  from,  but  I'd be interested in reading them.

I  have found that sometimes bouncing works and sometimes it doesn't, and if
it  doesn't then you don't bounce again, you delete. Mailwasher allows me to
do that. Bouncing doesn't happen automatically, it is a user option, and can
be selected and deselected, and used independently in individual filters.

PP> If  you  want  flexibility in fighting spam make use of RBLs and systems
PP> like  SpamAssassin (like!!! there might be others that work in a similar
PP> fashion. I don't want to break it down on SA being "the one"!).

That's what Mailwasher does. I use ORDB, VISI, SpamCop, and filter according
to the results.

PP> THAT  is  flexible,  not "annoying innocent postmasters" (especially the
PP> one  from  your  own ISP!) by filling their inbox with those ineffective
PP> doublebounces  ('double' because in 99% your "bounce" will bounce itself
PP> and the so called double bounce will end up in postmasters mailbox).

I  very  much  suspect that your fears are totall unfounded, and that if you
really  wanted to worry about something try non Mailwasher bounced messages.
I  don't  think for a minute that the contribution that Mailwasher is making
to  the  millions of bounced messages floating about everyday is going to be
at  all  significant,  and  if  a  postmaster  is  going  to whine about the
occassional  bounced  message  they've he or she has spend far too much time
tracing  back  to  a local Mailwasher user then well, what can I say accept,
try finding another hobby! ;-)

- --
Sl�n,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

******************************************
PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/

Faffing about with TB! v1.61 on W2K SP3

#1830. Mar Qed I Sly Row Us �

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your freedom with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966

iQA/AwUBPe4Eistub/5cfolmEQI+pQCgnyoMmIvPxUtMyzj/1N/7cQmj6YIAoPzk
cFSBVVs4WP0kfN3ltsb8Iv3A
=Pz71
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to