-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Simon,
Saturday, December 14, 2002, 2:43:25 AM, you wrote (possibly edited): MR>> If I choose "Internal Implementation", your S/MIME signatures verify as MR>> "valid". If, however, I choose the "Microsoft CryptoAPI" implementation MR>> of S/MIME, your very same message returns a verification of "invalid". > As I have said, not for me. Excuse for interjecting here, not having read this thread from the beginning. I would like to mention that my experience is the same as Melissa's regarding the above point. Surely, inconsistent results detract a lot from the reliability of S/MIME as a security system. - -- Best regards, Costas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/ iQA/AwUBPfrpGZxi4I+G4ZmXEQLx+ACg3YnPGA4x8KdCqJeP8xwd5dV0iksAoITe YJwuW0t1sM1EpBG7V7E3XzAq =Exly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
