-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Daniel Rail wrote...
>>> If the sort is only applied to the viewing of the list of filters, >>> I wouldn't mind. >> But how do you sort on displayed, and not alter the order of >> affect? You'd then have to tag each filter with an order number, >> and have that displayed somewhere too, and allow sorting by that, >> and make it easily modifiable. > My guess is that a field representing the order of the filters > already exist, it's just not displayed. Save them in the order the filters are to be used it. That saves having to write any indexing routines to sort the data. Then you don't have to use additional data to do that... but I guess it isn't too difficult to add the order option... just difficult to display it when you start sorting the filters... that'd then become a pain in the department of writing the order of the filters... but I guess it is entirely dependant on how they store their filters as to how easy it is. >>> It would be nice to at least have a search capability. >> A sort in the search would be fine > That would be fine as well. It'd be the easiest to implement, that's for sure. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPiXl5yuD6BT4/R9zEQKLQgCgnuOWAAvN66U3DkmkOFnUTN7d3pAAniXb K1WX0ymSYHbu7fgu9UvsTIV2 =S9/b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
