-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Daniel Rail wrote...
>>> Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow? >> If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the order >> in which they are applied. That could have a disastrous affect in >> some situations. > If the sort is only applied to the viewing of the list of filters, I > wouldn't mind. But how do you sort on displayed, and not alter the order of affect? You'd then have to tag each filter with an order number, and have that displayed somewhere too, and allow sorting by that, and make it easily modifiable. > It would be nice to at least have a search capability. A sort in the search would be fine... because that truly would only be a name listing of the filter, and sorting on it would be just like sorting on a search result from a mailbox. > But, I just couldn't imagine someone having around 100 filters under > incoming and trying to manage them. I have close to 60 on one account. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPiXB1yuD6BT4/R9zEQIUFQCg4cgB3qPSKIELKRTGOoaqYtyUUagAoPbe x6eKcBZO99nbjNhpQ7wr32+y =WVis -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
