Hi Wolffe, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 3:14:07 AM, you wrote:
W> On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 chinchi stated: c>> Hi Miguel, c>> Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote: c>> I just did a test. I marked all 81 messages in my inbox as unread c>> using the message dispatcher and then downloaded them in to an c>> empty local inbox. I did this once again. The total was 81 + 81 = c>> 162 fine. But when i used the kill dupes command on inbox, it c>> deleted just 80 messages, leaving one dupe even having the same c>> mssage ID. The size was a little bit different tho it was the exact c>> same message. W> How far off was the size difference? It could be a matter of an W> extra digit in the time log for download. 9:59:01 vs 10:00:02 W> I'd be curious to know what the exact difference is that precluded W> it from being identified as a duplicate. This information could then W> be used in future updates to more accurately tweak the deduper. One of them is 4,156 bytes and the other is 4,040 bytes though there's no difference in the actual messages. -- Best regards, chinchi ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
