Marck, On 21-02-2003 16:01, you [M] wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
M> Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO. M> Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed M> in the blacklists. There are many different blacklists. Some are more aggressive than others. I agree that they may hit some innocent people but with SpamPal _you_ can decide what to do with the marked messages and you can "whitelist" yourself. With the amount of spam today I feel this is the only way to go. M> Spammers seldom use the same route twice, preferring to use M> non-blacklisted addresses. Then people better make sure their SMTP server does accept connections from just anyone. -- <greeting> Best regards </greeting> <author> Peter Fjelsten </author> <thebat version> 1.63 Beta/7 </thebat version> <os> Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1</os> ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
