Friday, 2/28/2003, 8:24 AM
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 23:02:16 [GMT +0700] (which was 8:02 AM where I live)
you wrote about: 'A way to modify _incoming_ mail'
TF> But only if sender's mid and receiver's mid show the same message,
TF> isn't it? I can modify any message by exporting/editing/importing it.
I don't have a problem with that as long as it comes up with a new mid.
The law enforcement trend here in the US is the impounding of all computers when
a search warrant is executed. I do not agree with that policy unless it is
explicit on the warrant, it is still done. Once that hard drive is not in your
control, any hacker could make the mids match. That is one reason I am no longer
in law enforcement. Old age being another ;)
TF> I am all for that "red flag", or a small icon indicating that the
TF> message was edited, which I don't have in the current version. ;-)
I guess we all get a little over confident in the security of electronic
messages. Long live PGP.
--
Your communication is greatly appreciated,
Paul
URA Redneck If U buy a new house and have to take the wheels off.
Powered by <The Bat!> v1.63 Beta/7 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
