-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roberto,
@12-Mar-2003, 10:39 -0500 (15:39 UK time) Roberto Machorro [RM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I've been using TB! for almost a year and a half now, and loving >> it. But now the itch to try out SecureBat has begun and I'm >> thinking on purchasing a license for it. RM> Anyway... so any comments on it? If you need to secure access to your off-line mail system and its data, SB is ideal. RM> I'm not worried about someone popping in my home for my RM> password. I know I'll actually have that password handy as I RM> tend to be forgetful. My main reason for encryption are: RM> A) Spyware. I know that some spyware read files for addresses RM> and stuff, this would be one way to deceive them. It would. RM> B) Viruses. I don't have any problems with this as I'm using an RM> anti-virus (name concealed to prevent yet another Holy War) Not actually relevant to SB. RM> C) Prying eyes, curiosity gets the best of everyone SB would stop this. RM> D) If I loose my laptop... (which I pray it never happens!) SB would protect your mailbase if this were to happen. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+b2SCOeQkq5KdzaARAn3DAKDDePV10ZOhCgHXOaxGHovrQNR6ywCg8G87 xPEITkYN5XOr86SXJ2aGAjw= =bZPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
