Hello Martin, Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:19:18 PM, you wrote:
MW> Hello rick, MW> Everyone, I guess Rick likes Nod32 (Eset)! And I'm sure it's a good MW> product. But it's certainly not the only one... And your assessment is MW> a little misleading (if not false). For example, the tests go back MW> some five years and were run on many different operating systems. To MW> be fair, you need to look at the most recent tests. Here you'll find MW> that 3 other products do as well as Eset and a further 7 may do as MW> well (there was no entry for one or more tests). There is nothing misleading about my statement. Lets look at it from a logical point of view. Ok. 1. the anti-virus vendors submit to virus bulletin therefore if the latest anti-virus definitions were not submitted then its the vendors fault not virus bulletin. 2. you state that the tests go back some five years and compare many operating systems. I don't know how you argue this point. If nod32 was good on all the operating systems while many others were not and nod32 is still good today then the advantage lies in nod32 being able to keep up and detect the changing virii which change constantly. Therefore by your own admission nod32 is a better product. MW> In the end, it's personal choice. I guess its a personal choice to stand in the street and get hit by a truck but I am not planning on doing that anytime soon. Thats a good analogy for your anti-virus advice. MW> M -- Best regards, rick ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
