Hello rick,

Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 10:11:29 PM, you wrote:

r> Hello Martin,

r> Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:19:18 PM, you wrote:

MW>> Everyone, I guess Rick likes Nod32 (Eset)! And I'm sure it's a good
MW>> product. But it's certainly not the only one... And your assessment is
MW>> a little misleading (if not false). For example, the tests go back
MW>> some five years and were run on many different operating systems. To
MW>> be fair, you need to look at the most recent tests. Here you'll find
MW>> that 3 other products do as well as Eset and a further 7 may do as
MW>> well (there was no entry for one or more tests).

r> There is nothing misleading about my statement. Lets look at it from a
r> logical point of view. Ok.

r> 1. the anti-virus vendors submit to virus bulletin therefore if the
r> latest anti-virus definitions were not submitted then its the vendors
r> fault not virus bulletin.

r> 2. you state that the tests go back some five years and compare many
r> operating systems. I don't know how you argue this point. If nod32 was
r> good on all the operating systems while many others were not and nod32
r> is still good today then the advantage lies in nod32 being able to
r> keep up and detect the changing virii which change constantly.
r> Therefore by your own admission nod32 is a better product.

MW>> In the end, it's personal choice.

r> I guess its a personal choice to stand in the street and get hit by a
r> truck but I am not planning on doing that anytime soon.  Thats a good
r> analogy for your anti-virus advice.

Okay, if having the last say makes you happy so be it. But, don't
misquote me: I did not say any product was better than another. To put
it in _simple_ terms, AV products are a bit like shares: past
performance is no guarantee of future performance.

But that's enough flogging a dead horse for today.

M
-- 
Regards,
Martin Webster
http://www.martinwebster.info/

All outgoing mail checked for viruses with Sophos Anti-Virus


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to