Hi Marck, MDP> Please stop quoting the VB100 report as if they are "the only game MDP> in town". This is misleading and only an opinion - not by any means MDP> the logical conclusion you make it out to be. Yes, I have read their MDP> testing criteria and personally dismiss them as imperfect. AVG is MDP> not the "swiss cheese" they purport it to be and folks have already MDP> given many links to other "professional" AV testing outfits that MDP> disagree with VB100. You should not invest so much trust in a single MDP> (flawed) source of information. You certainly should not post their MDP> (and therefore your <bg>) "opinion" as fact.
And if I may add to that - in a professional installation of a "sheep dip" computer for receipt of messages from outside an organisation, etc the likelihood is that at least *three* different AV passes will be made over any file with three different pieces of AV software. Because professionals know that *NO* AV whoever good, is 100% perfect every time. -- Best regards, Mike ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
