Hello Wayne, Saturday, March 15, 2003, 1:54:07 PM, you wrote:
> Or... Would it be a better *not* to use the plug-in and configure NODs > pop3scan for each account? As a NOD32 user for a couple of years now, I have tried the plug-in and also found it to be intrusive. For me and my machine I prefer to use the Popscan program instead. At least on this machine it seems to perform faster. Now, on one of those newer P4 machines with their fast processors, the owners may have a different story all together. I run the popscan along with VET as the file monitor. I have been with VET for years back when it was popular for intranet systems. Vet catches and deletes the attached virus in the temp folder, that is just how I have my machine set up, your mileage may vary:) Bottom line both program have caught most virus att. thus far (knocking on wood) -- Cheers, Dean The Bat1.63 Beta/7 ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html