ON Saturday, March 29, 2003, 2:30:28 AM, you wrote: AM> Gerard [G] wrote:
AM> But wouldn't postcast have to accept the mail before it's sent? Sure, but what I meant was is that the mail has been send from TB to Postcast, so there is no problem with TB G>> I have had a situation on about half a dozen occasions that TB! G>> didn't send a certain email while simultaneously sending others. The G>> sending process would hang at a certain email. I found that changing G>> the content slightly (just adding a space most of the times) would G>> cure the problem. I have no clue why and how. AM> Very strange indeed. I've never had such a problem while using AM> MDaemon as my mail server here. TB! doesn't have to be at fault AM> there. It could just as easily be a Postcast problem. Could be, I will not dismiss that. I keep telling myself that next time I will save the msg and do some experimenting with it. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= It Is Time To Quit When... You leave the pin in when you are on the fringe 8 feet from the pin in the hope it will stop your ball. Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

