Hello Miguel, On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:07:39 +0100 your time, you said:
M> I regularly manage 3 accounts during working hours (I have some M> more though). Which do you think would be the benefit to me of M> having a common Inbox for my accounts? I don't know. Only you will know if such a setup could be of use to you ;-) Here's a situation where single accounts with multiple transport settings could prove to be useful: You have 6 pop boxes. 3 are related, 2 are related and 1 isn't. Instead of setting up 6 separate accounts in the account tree it would be convenient to be able to group pops by account. E.g. +--account 1 (pop 1; pop 2; pop 3) | +--Inbox +--account 2 (pop 4; pop 5) | +--Inbox +--account 3 (pop 6) | +--Inbox The way it is now you have to have it like this: +--account 1 (pop 1) | +--Inbox +--account 2 (pop 2) | +--Inbox +--account 3 (pop 3) | +--Inbox +--account 4 (pop 4) | +--Inbox +--account 5 (pop 6) | +--Inbox +--account 6 (pop 6) | +--Inbox You can of course filter into a common inbox but then you still have multiple accounts. A way around this is to pop to a local mail server like Mercury/32 and filtering all incoming messages in TB! (as I do). Still not as convenient as multiple pop settings though, IMO. But what is good for me obviously isn't going to be good for everyone :-) -- Sl�n, Simon @ i~n+f~o+w~i+z~a+r~d+.~c+o~.+u~k ***************************************** PGP Key via Web: http://pgp.infowizard.co.uk/ PGP Key via Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Faffing about with TB! v1.62r on W2K SP4 #1994. Warm Red Is Sly Quo � ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
