Hello Marck, Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 8:03:24 AM, you wrote:
> No - it is a sad delusional condition suffered by many *nix list
> admins who believe that nobody intends to reply to the list by
> default and that all replies should be sent offline. Fortunately, we
> in the real world live in enlightened times :-).
He he he!! I just never had that happen to me before. I was scolded,
albeit privately, for including my own address in the Reply-To header,
but I told them that I never purposely set out to do that. I took
Thomas's advice and that seems to have corrected the problem.
> You can't, but you can use a folder level reply template to enforce
> a reply to the list. Now, I'm usually against such practices because
> of the dangers and difficulties when sending a reply to a list that
> *should* have gone privately - or clicking a mailto while the folder
> has the focus.
Ha ha ha ha!! Yes... I remember many conversations on that subject! ;o)
I'm going to stay away from Folder level templates... except for the
GnuPG List which sadly requires one.
--
-=Nick Andriash=-
-=Creston, B.C. Canada=-
Using The Bat! v2.01.26 on Windows 98
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
