Hello Carsten, Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 8:21:31 AM, you wrote:
> This is done intentionally by the list administrators. > See <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>. What they claim as a 2nd Reply-To header if you direct your Reply to "All"... is not really a 2nd Reply-To header... but an entry to the Cc: header. That Linux Mandrake List is the only List where they don't "munge" the Reply-To header. All my Yahoo Groups Lists munge the header, and by doing so they direct more replies through to the List. I suppose I don't agree with that article... and the fact that only a few List Admins choose not to munge them... tells me that many others agree with me as well. :o) I have though added the macro that Thomas has suggested, and that seems to take care of my problem. Thanks Carsten for the reply... It answered my question. -- -=Nick Andriash=- -=Creston, B.C. Canada=- Using The Bat! v2.01.26 on Windows 98
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
