j>> - encode attachments using MIME Base64 MP> a particular reason for this? (encode...)
No. Just default I guess. I don't even know the diferences! MP> Does it help if you use Folder / Maintenance / Compress? No. Have tried this. MP> I suppose that depends on how many (and from what sources) you get. Yes. I had over 12,000 attachments prior to doing the upgrade. I receive one news group by digest, among other requisites. The attached messages accumulate very rapidly. The files are renamed with an illogical to read name and consequently the attachment folder is becoming a *super sized* trash can. Unfortunately still holding some required files. Please, if someone else could test this. I shouldn't be hard. Send yourself an email with attachment. Have attachments go to a special custom folder (if stored with the email body, I guess you would never know whether or not the attachment is being deleted when you delete the email). Delete and check for attachment. ?? So far there is only; - Myself - Rich I upgraded very recently (2.01.3). Rich has the same Ver. Mark you have Ver 2.01.56 (how come?) Could this be it? -- Best regards, jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
