Hi Stuart

On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 1:42 PM, shemming wrote:

> When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?

That's the same question I had. As I have SpamAssassin on the mail
server, most of my spam gets caught and filtered that way, but I was
hoping that this would catch the one or two that slip by every week.

> For the last few days I've received a number of near identical
> messages telling me that i need to update my system with the attached
> security fix.

> I know that the mail is junk and the the file is a virus.

> Each copy of the message that comes in I mark as junk. I thought that
> this process was supposed to 'teach' bayesit so that it would throw
> away the crap when it came in.

That was my impression too, and from what I've read on the lists, it
has worked well for others. I also had installed the other plug-in for
spam as well and that didn't work at all either. Yesterday, I
uninstalled the plug-ins, cleared out the registry keys manually and
reinstalled the BayesIt only. I'm going to test one at a time now.

> Either I'm doing something wrong or, well, not. If I'm doing it right
> then why isn't bayesit catching this stuff?

I went back to the site and read all the notes on it and most likely,
I did not have many (or even any) spam messages to add when I
installed it the first time. The author says that initial training
should include both. I therefore made the assumption that I have done
something wrong. I'll give this installation a chance to work for a
little while and see what happens.

Sorry, I know this wasn't much help, but at least you're not alone.:)

-- 
Regards,
Terry

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1


________________________________________________
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to