Hi Thomas.

At 10:20 AM on Sunday, May 02, 2004 it seems you posted the following
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in response to my comments Uread Message
Tab:

JR>>  It simply comes down to a difference in people.
> 
> OK, OK. But we both agree it's a minor issue, right? ;-)

  Given the state of the world we now live in, I think most things are
  minor issues, including this one.


>>> Also please note that I receive most of your postings twice. You seem
>>> to TBUDL twice in the TO field.
> 
JR>>   Yes, strange. When I take your msg & <ctrl><enter>, TB! seems to
JR>>   reply to the "To:" as well as the "Reply To:".....  never seen that
JR>>   before. A buglet maybe?
> 
> I would guess a stray reply template is the culprit. With one "%TO="
> macro too many.

Here's the appropriate portion of my reply template. I always thought
the %REPLYTO applied to the sender & the %To is fairly standard, isn't
it? Do you see a problem with this template? I think the %ReplyTo
macro is now placing that information on the To: line. What do you
think?

-- 
%QINCLUDE="signbat"
%REPLYTO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
%ACCOUNT="IDT"
%To=%OTOADDR  

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V2.10.03/W2K_SP3
ICQ 41116329


________________________________________________
Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to