On Saturday, May 29, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... You're likely to get a moderator jump on you for top posting... Suggest you read the welcome message ;)
> The Bat! Is made for users and not for RFCs. To communicate with the world, TheBat MUST follow RFCs. > If there are some "bad" webmasters the user of The Bat don't have to suffer > of some RFCs... There is a hack around it, and it is a registry change to fix it... read the archives, there are many items on this. > For example "Microsoft Office Outlook 2003" work fine with both variants and > it splits on some RFCs, it just do its work. Outlook fails to follow many RFCs, and causes MANY problems with other clients because of it... going to tell the other programmers to "fix" their stuff too because MS doesn't want to follow the rules? They're setup for a reason :) > So you just trying to tell me that Ritlabs don't think about its users - it > think about some "stupid" RFC. There are very few "stupid" RFCs... the rest are written for people to communicate with... if they didn't exist, people wouldn't be able to communicate on the internet. > Also this BUG with ?subject= is not that case when you have to speak about > RFC. RFC says that any spaces in a URI MUST be encoded with %20... That means that spaces have to be converted... anybody that doesn't is breaking RFCs. > It must be done so that The Bat understands "spaces" and this will > neither way break the work of The Bat with RFC. Erm... If TB is changed to accept it, then it does break RFCs. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Using The Bat! v2.11 Beta/8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Squirt guns don't soak people, People soak people.
pgpqHTnDVRyX2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
