Hello Jan Rifkinson, 24-Aug-2004 22:01, you wrote:
> Yes, of course you are right about your second poing but, just to be > stubborn for one more moment, If BayesIT filters see msgs before TB! > filters then this would not be necessary, right? And I can't get a > definite answer to this question yet. It doesn't matter wether BayesIt comes first or TB's filters come first when processing messages. If a message passes BayesIt as not spam (while it actually is spam) and your filter picks it up as being spam, how would BayesIt ever know the message was spam? Or what do you mean? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Is it not that Her Majesty's government infored our people of what they know about U.F.O.'s? I think it is time our people were told the truth. -- Brinsley Le Poer Trench, Earl of Clancarty ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
