On Thursday, August 26, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
>> So, tonight I have 376 msgs in my junk folder. I marked none of them as >> junk, i.e. they were all junked automatically -- presumably by BayesIT. >> So here are my stats ASK> Those 376 junk mails are a "total", correct? Hi Alexander. yes. However, at this point I have 651. ASK> I mean... >> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) ASK> ... :-) >> Anyone have any ideas beyond the notion that the macros don't work. Or >> put it another way, has anyone found that the macros do work & represent >> some real numbers? ASK> Try replacing the "(24)" hours in the macro call with a number large enough ASK> to give a "totals" value maybe? Changed to 48 hrs. Stats: Spam Stats, last 48 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) Total Spam Emails: 69 Total Clean Emails: 286 BayesIT guessed right 99.478261% of the time My email is 19.43662% spam Then for kicks I selected all msgs in junk file <651> and marked them as junk manually. BayesIT went thru training. Stats below. So I'll have to go with my conclusion until someone comes up with a definitive answer about BayesIT stats. Spam Stats, last 48 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) Total Spam Emails: 70 Total Clean Emails: 288 BayesIT guessed right 99.471429% of the time My email is 19.553073% spam Thanks, -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield CT USA TB! v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7 W2K v5.0 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
