-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

   ***^\     ."_)~~
 ~( __ _"o   Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 08:51:13 -0700,
   @  @      when Lynn wrote:

> Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 5:35:49 AM, you wrote:

.....

> As this is kind of off-topic, I hope you don't mind me emailing you
> directly ..

Hi Lyn. If you by "directly" meant "using personal address" of mine then
it went astray. (-: If I, though, didn't get this "direct" meaning, then
I got myself astray. Anyway, since I do not see any "compromising"
contents here, I'll reply via the list. (-:

> Do you know if Foxmail handles IMAP?

No. I mean it doesn't. As far as I know. The version I have, and am
talking about, is 4.1, and if they made a newer one I didn't see it,
yet.

It handles SMS, some "E-mail Express", hotmail access and some other
bells, but not IMAP. (Bear in mind that this version of mine is made in
2002.)

> I would hate to have to let TB go, as it is much the best
> mailer that I've looked at, and I've been using it since
> early 1x versions, but I now have an IMAP account, and it
> doesn't do that well.

I understand. I have friends and relatives behaving right this way, but
am still sticking with them. (: (Example: My uncle is almost totally
deaf, so that I have to scream when talking to him, but he taught me
this summer to drive a tractor. There.) And while a software has much
more room for "improvement", its better accepting the people as they are
and trying to "change" just software. ... What I am afraid of here is a
pending possibility, "in my heart", of accepting TB as a member of
family. <mixed feelings>

> And of course, I'm not happy about this so-called upgrade,
> either, which sounds like it doesn't address old problems,
> among them the IMAP handling. I'm not much interested in a
> flashy interface; I want function.

(-: My musings of the flash was just a trick to seduce attention of
members, since atmosphere became really hot today. I don't know if this
worked, or made even a bigger mess. While really, I prefer the same:
functionality. And, you know this perhaps already, when we are not
pleased with the function, then we complain and complain, finding any
reason, a "victim" and a target aside.

But anyway wouldn't hurt if TB interface would attain just an averagely
polished state.

- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at: <http://pgp.mit.edu/> once just before breakfast
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFBNhIH9q62QPd3XuIRAqieAKCUJaRdVC6f3b4fW3cGJIvuC0/gzQCgkmFK
RqPaxxEjKZfYIOu2RxF5RK4=
=MplA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to