Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:16:40 AM, you wrote: >> Do you know if Foxmail handles IMAP?
MM> No. I mean it doesn't. As far as I know. The version MM> I have, and am MM> talking about, is 4.1, and if they made a newer one I MM> didn't see it, MM> yet. OK ... write that one off :-) [snip] >> I would hate to have to let TB go, as it is much the >> best mailer that I've looked at, and I've been using it >> since early 1x versions, but I now have an IMAP >> account, and it doesn't do that well. MM> I understand. I have friends and relatives behaving MM> right this way, but am still sticking with them. (: MM> (Example: My uncle is almost totally deaf, so that I MM> have to scream when talking to him, but he taught me MM> this summer to drive a tractor. There.) lol! I hadn't thought of it as a relative, exactly, but you may be right :-) After all, my DH is as deaf as a post, but I haven't upgraded him :-) MM> And while a software has much more room for MM> "improvement", its better accepting the people as they MM> are and trying to "change" just software. ... What I MM> am afraid of here is a pending possibility, "in my MM> heart", of accepting TB as a member of family. <mixed MM> feelings> An armed truce, sort of? [snip] MM> (-: My musings of the flash was just a trick to seduce MM> attention of members, since atmosphere became really MM> hot today. I don't know if this worked, or made even a MM> bigger mess. While really, I prefer the same: MM> functionality. And, you know this perhaps already, MM> when we are not pleased with the function, then we MM> complain and complain, finding any reason, a "victim" MM> and a target aside. I think the issue is (for me anyway), if the function hasn't been upgraded, or at least debugged, then I don't consider an improved interface much of an inducement. MM> But anyway wouldn't hurt if TB interface would attain MM> just an averagely polished state. As long as it can be done without turning the package into slow bloatware :-) If I can figure out how to deal with the warts in 2.12, I'll keep that at least, unless I can find something that does excellent IMAP, but so far ... I'm beginning to think it's IMAP itself. I wasn't impressed with TBird or Mulberry; I gather those are pretty highly thought of .. I'm probably hooked on TB; you're right, it's like family: can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em! Anyway, thanks! Lynn TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed * * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
