-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 10:46:56 +0100, @ @ when Morgan Pugh wrote:
> a jump for 2.12 to 3.x is pretty impressive, you would think loads of > new features would have been added but I can't find them. I got trapped as well. Downloaded TBHome, backed up all Mail and TB files, and fired up the setup. Still couldn't see anything worth the new price. But, sometimes I figure some things slowly. Will try again, when I find a time. And a patience for popups slapping. > All i can see is an ugly UI. But we are (all I guess) accustomed to, already. (-: You know, is not all in appearance. There is something "in soul" too. So, it isn't a shock anymore. > I think I will stick with 2.12 and look for another client :( I do that all the time. Still no a big joy. Did you try ever FoxMail? As to simultaneous dealing with multiple accounts (which is main reason I use TB), it's even faster than TB, and is free. But some other things are not so good. > I guess September 1st 2004 was the day they destroyed The Bat! :( TB 9/1. I have said something similar when 1.6xxxx... was released. Might be easily, probably, I am wrong, but from those days on is more and more dissatisfaction around. On the other side, I still use TB (-; and many other people I know who share my reactions, and opinions. There is even a third side, of people attracted by a new "politics" of RITlabs. It's marketing. Pretty disorganized and confused sometimes, though, but it modified the original conception and that's it. It happens all the time. On the fourth side, I know groups of people who abandoned TB, because of (actually non-existing) HTML editor, which dwells in the body of TB as some carious and useless tissue, just wasting resources, and it lasts and lasts. I'd like if I am able to somehow surgically remove it, and some other "features", but am not a programmer. Nor a "hacker". (-; If you have such "features" in a version which comes with a better tiny detail, as is newer LOG (which is valuable for my spam "politics") then you have to accept all MBs of other tissues. I think is much better, for many things here, if some new features have to be included, that all the work -- until it's finished! -- has to be excluded from official versions, and, if beta test(ers) are seriously needed, that this beta branch is kept *completely* separated of the "product", and a wider public. Doing it otherwise, can produce only what it produces - a total mess. (-: And angry people. Very angry. (: "Homer angryyy! Homer destroooy". That's the way it is. (: Cheers. Until the next juke-box... (-; Mail me tendeeer, mail me sweeet... :eyes: - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: <http://pgp.mit.edu/> once just before breakfast -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFBNcIk9q62QPd3XuIRAp/tAJ4sGh+TStE0ZOGhUTca7BffWf5peQCfaD+g /LW/ObRuQLgC05o31U5EqEU= =UNML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
