Hello Allie,

Saturday, September 4, 2004, 1:44:44 PM, you wrote:

> Tony, [T] wrote:

>> Add fat graphics, animated stuff, and useless gadgets. IMO TB! made
>> it's 1st step in that direction with the new icons and promise of
>> skins.

> <soapbox>

> You know, I find this interesting.

> The very common negative commentary about new icons and smilies with
> improved XP look support is just testimony to how these things are
> noticed, whether it be positively or negatively.

> The applications appearance is the first thing that greets the user.
> Putting reliability and robust functionality aside as being a must, an
> attractive interface adds a lot to an application that requires day to
> day user interaction. IOW's, if I had two applications with equal
> functionality, reliability and ease of use, I'd personally go for the
> one that I found more pleasant to look at. It's not a waste of time
> and development to spend a while focusing on improving the
> applications appearance. Furthermore, it's not usually the cause of
> unreliability creeping in, neither does it contribute much to bloating
> the software.

> What has made TB! difficult to tame in terms of reliability and bugs
> are not the introduction of smilies and the efforts at improving the
> applications appearance as is so commonly mentioned, since it seems to
> be popular to do so like promoting Linux. ;)

> - A completely reworked view column modes setup/interface introduced a
> lot of bugs for a while.

> - The continuing effort at offering Full IMAP support in what
> originally was a sophisticated POP3 client has offered serious
> challenges in maintaining reliability and keeping the bugs out. Not to
> mention the overall size of the application. There are clients like
> ThunderBird and Mulberry who focus only on IMAP since it's work enough
> in itself to fully implement.

> - A completely reworked filtering system has added its own problems
> while being ironed out.

> - A scheduler was added

> - Chat support was added

> - The plug-in interfaces were added.
> But please, I'm personally really getting tired of the comments about
> smilies and new icons as if they comprise a HUGE coding effort that
> could have been channeled elsewhere, or that they comprise a
> significant source of buggy behaviour and bloat in TB!.

 The only issue I have with smilies is that it's impossible to ignore
 the ):( type characters in the text - and that's just as annoying for
 me as seeing the actual graphic (but maybe I am a grumpy old s*d as my
 wife says).

 I'd be ecstatic if the next version of TB could filter these
 characters out of my received messages.

-- 
regards,
Clive T


________________________________________________
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to