Thorvald Neumann, [TN] wrote:

> I guess this is what Marck wanted to tell us, isn't it? >;)

Indeed, it was. So it wasn't a lecture against any sort of use of
Folder Templates use. Folder templates are OK until you start adding
macros that insert addresses in the various fields, i.e., To, CC or
BCC. It can be a serious source of embarrassment since we are
invariably tired at times or just rushing for some reason.

You really don't need a folder template for lists like TBUDL that
insert the list address in the reply to header for each message it
sends to members.

You need only create a single address book entry with the list address
as the entries address. Name the entry TBUDL. Create the templates you
need to use for the list. You can use whatever specialized template
you wish and it will never create a problem for private messaging to
members. It doesn't matter what folder the list message ends up in
either. Your specialized templates will always be triggered as needed.
It's the advantage of address book templates not being bound to
folders that attracts me to them. I use them when I can.

-- 
-= Allie =-
..... Classified tagline. Please enter password: _
___________________________________________________________________
IMAP Client: The Bat!� v3.0.1 RC2 | SquirrelMail WebMail
IMAP Server: Mdaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 1)



________________________________________________
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to